Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · California

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte

El Monte, CA · ~78 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte runs at 314% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade F.

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte: 11.9 TCR = 314% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte safety composite

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte: 4.7 → 19.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 19.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.61× in 2018

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte's TCR rose 14.5 from 4.7 in 2017 to 19.2 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · El Monte, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 314% of ind

  • DART 19.2 DART
  • RANK #81/91
  • PHOTO Three Points Center …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Three Points Center - Hurricane (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trinity Youth Services - El Monte averages 11.9 TCR (314% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte TCR series: 2017=4.7 · 2018=19.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Trinity Youth Services - El Monte falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 91 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in California.

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte (78 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Trinity Youth Services - El Monte
Trinity Youth Services - El Monte (78 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Trinity Youth Services - El Monte has more employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 19.2 19.2 9 0 0
2017 4.7 3.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · CA · El Monte

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 71 employers in El Monte, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Three Points Center - Hurricane 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-571603 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calhoun County Juvenile Home 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homme 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Endive Farms 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE VF - Napa 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Russell Harris Farms 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hadley Date Gardens, Inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 231 2,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPS1 1,431 FTE
CITY-NEAR CMS Telstar 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR D Longo, LLC dba Longo Toyota 612 FTE
NAT-TCR Lci - 084 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Home Care 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Westview Acres 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Partridge House 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marjorie Doyle Rockwell Center 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE RDU - Airport United Airlines Offices 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iron Hill Brewery- Voorhees 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Shale Columbus Brick 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.