Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery, farm-type, manufacturing · North Dakota

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF

Grand Forks, ND · ~43 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF runs at 407% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery, farm-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF: 13.4 TCR = 407% of Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery, farm-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF safety composite

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF: 15.3 → 16.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2024

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF's TCR rose 1.3 from 15.3 in 2017 to 16.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Grand Forks, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.4 · 407% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #13/17
  • PHOTO MJM Farms, L P
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MJM Farms, L P (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tristeel Manufacturing - GF averages 13.4 TCR (407% of the Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery, farm-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF TCR series: 2017=15.3 · 2018=15.2 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=14.3 · 2021=15.4 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=14.2 · 2024=16.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Tristeel Manufacturing - GF falls in its industry

433 Grading, cleaning, and sorting establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 17 Grading, cleaning, and sorting employers in North Dakota.

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF (43 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tristeel Manufacturing - GF
Tristeel Manufacturing - GF (43 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Tristeel Manufacturing - GF has fewer employees than the Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.5 5.5 9 0 0
2023 14.2 10.1 7 0 0
2022 11.7 4.7 5 0 0
2021 15.4 2.2 7 0 0
2020 14.3 9.5 6 0 0
2019 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2018 15.2 5.1 6 0 0
2017 15.3 3.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · ND · Grand Forks

433 Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery, farm-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 175 employers in Grand Forks, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MJM Farms, L P 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pik Rite, Inc. 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gandy Company 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Osmundson Mfg Co 13.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bob's Oilfield Service, Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Electric 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montana Dakota Utilities - Dickinson, ND 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dakota Fence Company - Bismarck 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Altru Health System Med Park 2,709 FTE
CITY-NEAR LM Wind Power 907 FTE
CITY-NEAR LM Wind Power : Grand Forks 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Eldercare Center 606 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0248 Hermosa Beach 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sycamore Run 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carris Reels VT 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Passaic County Welders 13.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fulkerson Plumbing & Heating, Co., Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dahle Orchards LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quaglino Roofing 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.