Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Arkansas

Triumph Airborne Structures

Hot Springs National Park, AR · ~254 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Triumph Airborne Structures runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

Triumph Airborne Structures: 1.8 TCR = 41% of Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Triumph Airborne Structures safety composite

Triumph Airborne Structures scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2023

Triumph Airborne Structures injury rate improved

Triumph Airborne Structures's TCR fell 0.6 from 2.1 in 2022 to 1.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.1 · 2023=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Hot Springs National Park, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO 345
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~254 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 345 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Triumph Airborne Structures in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Triumph Airborne Structures averages 1.8 TCR (41% of the Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Triumph Airborne Structures TCR series: 2022=2.1 · 2023=1.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Triumph Airborne Structures falls in its industry

992 Maintenance and repair service establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Maintenance and repair service employers in Arkansas.

Triumph Airborne Structures (254 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Triumph Airborne Structures
Triumph Airborne Structures (254 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Triumph Airborne Structures has more employees than the Maintenance and repair services, aircraf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.5 0.4 4 0 0
2022 2.1 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · AR · Hot Springs National Park

992 Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 11 employers in Hot Springs National Park, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 345 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support Jacksonville 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Systems - ATAC ACE 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Aviation- CSC Sacramento 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2904-0238 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5108 Little Rock GRC 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE 025-00623 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6818 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gigerich Electrical INC 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOT SPRINGS NATIONAL PARK_1438587 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOT SPRINGS ALBERT PIKE STA_1352589 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hot Springs SD 42 FTE
NAT-TCR Damon Insulation Company Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Earl's Plumbing, Heating and Air 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Xpress Data Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Visual Options 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Juan County 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Munising 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greater Chicago Food Depository 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chewning and Wilmer, Inc. 254 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.