Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Georgia

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta

Atlanta, GA · ~59 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta: 3.5 TCR = 105% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta safety composite

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta held a steady TCR band

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.4 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 105% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/17
  • PHOTO Plascore, Inc. - Mac…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plascore, Inc. - Machine Core (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Triumph Interiors - Atlanta averages 3.5 TCR (105% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Triumph Interiors - Atlanta falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 17 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Georgia.

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta (59 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Triumph Interiors - Atlanta
Triumph Interiors - Atlanta (59 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Triumph Interiors - Atlanta has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.5 3.7 3 0 0
2016 2.4 2.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · GA · Atlanta

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plascore, Inc. - Machine Core 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferra Aerospace 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LSI, Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hartzell Propeller Composite 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE SolAmerica Energy 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crawford Grading, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benton Georgia LLC SP 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE ANS:ANMAR - ANMAR - Marietta, GA 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Griffin Creek Elementary 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Store 134 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Comfort Inn - Woodstock 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gulf Coast Repair & Machine Shop 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advanced Pultrusions LLC D/B/A Liberty Pultrusions 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Dolce Vita Per Tutti 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE FORJAK Industrial 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE NSPA 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.