Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), long-distance · Missouri

Troy Terminal

Troy, MO · ~137 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Troy Terminal runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), long-distance workplace, earning a grade A.

Troy Terminal: 1.7 TCR = 38% of Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), long-distance BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Troy Terminal safety composite

Troy Terminal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−112.8

2016→2024

Troy Terminal injury rate improved

Troy Terminal's TCR fell 112.8 from 115.4 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 115.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=115.4 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Troy, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 38% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #7/24
  • PHOTO Landes Trucking 7200…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~137 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Troy Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Troy Terminal averages 1.7 TCR (38% of the Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Troy Terminal TCR series: 2016=115.4 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Troy Terminal falls in its industry

1,026 Trucking, specialized freight establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 24 Trucking, specialized freight employers in Missouri.

Troy Terminal (137 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Troy Terminal
Troy Terminal (137 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Troy Terminal has more employees than the Trucking, specialized freight (except us median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.1 6 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 5 0 0
2022 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2020 1.3 0.7 2 0 0
2019 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 115.4 115.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · MO · Troy

1,026 Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 39 employers in Troy, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR D & M Carriers LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bosma Poultry Group LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grammer Logistics Montpelier Terminal 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Maintenance 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Four G Construction, Inc. DBA Geeding Construction, Inc. 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gateway Packaging Company LLC - Kansas City 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Action Mailing & Printing Solutions 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Motor Manufacturing Missouri 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bodine Aluminum, Inc. - Troy 851 FTE
CITY-NEAR 60 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 60 354 FTE
NAT-TCR FoodTown #207 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Powell's Books -- Cedar Hills Crossing 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CGH Vision and Oral Health Center 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR QSI Dillon 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE CLE Gunton Corporation 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE P.J. Hoerr Inc 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garr Tool Company 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2850 Grand Island Boulevard Operating Company, LLC 137 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.