Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance · Alabama

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull

Hope Hull, AL · ~45 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance workplace, earning a grade A.

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull: 1.7 TCR = 38% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull safety composite

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2020→2024

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull injury rate improved

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.3 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Hope Hull, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/40
  • PHOTO Troy Terminal
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Troy Terminal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull averages 1.7 TCR (38% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull TCR series: 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=3 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull falls in its industry

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 40 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Alabama.

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull (45 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull
Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull (45 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · AL · Hope Hull

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 8 employers in Hope Hull, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Troy Terminal 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR D & M Carriers LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bosma Poultry Group LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grammer Logistics Montpelier Terminal 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corbitt Power & Light LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gadsden Complex - APC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gadsden Complex 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottage Builders Inc, dba as CBI Construction Services 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daehan Solution LLC 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daehan Solution Alabama 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hope Hull 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR VT Miltope Hope Hull Office 108 FTE
NAT-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - PrePrint 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Warren Rupp, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mg Truss 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kennedy International Airport Power Plant 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Scrap Metal NC, LLC. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ben Parker Co., Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Engineering, Inc. 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.