Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway · Arizona

Truesdell Corporation of California

Tempe, AZ · ~39 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Truesdell Corporation of California runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway workplace, earning a grade D.

Truesdell Corporation of California: 4.6 TCR = 165% of Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Truesdell Corporation of California safety composite

Truesdell Corporation of California scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Truesdell Corporation of California held a steady TCR band

Truesdell Corporation of California's TCR held near 0.0 from 8.7 in 2017 to 8.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Tempe, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 165% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #53/63
  • PHOTO Coughlin Company I, …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coughlin Company I, Inc, (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Truesdell Corporation of California in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Truesdell Corporation of California averages 4.6 TCR (165% of the Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Truesdell Corporation of California TCR series: 2017=8.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=8.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Truesdell Corporation of California falls in its industry

4,078 Repair, highway, road, street, establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 63 Repair, highway, road, street, employers in Arizona.

Truesdell Corporation of California (39 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Truesdell Corporation of California
Truesdell Corporation of California (39 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Truesdell Corporation of California has fewer employees than the Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.8 5.8 3 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.7 8.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · AZ · Tempe

4,078 Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 569 employers in Tempe, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coughlin Company I, Inc, 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trebor Shoring Rentals - San Diego 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pave-Tech Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vastco, Inc 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE MyLand 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novo Power 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sterling Grove 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sharp Drywall 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR SALT RIVER PROJECT DISTRICT VALLEY 4,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR 202376 4,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Plants and Offices 4,518 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Communications, LLC 3,432 FTE
NAT-TCR Berry's Casino dba Silverado Casino 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DMSI 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100079 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TownPlace Suites by Marriott Portland Vancouver 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midwest Block - Jefb 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woolpert- Indianapolis 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bill Shields Roofing, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blumfield Piling Ground 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.