Fencing, prefabricated sections, wood, manufacturing · North Dakota

Truss Systems Inc.

Bismarck, ND · ~40 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Truss Systems Inc. runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fencing, prefabricated sections, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Truss Systems Inc.: 7.9 TCR = 240% of Fencing, prefabricated sections, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Truss Systems Inc. safety composite

Truss Systems Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2016→2024

Truss Systems Inc. injury rate improved

Truss Systems Inc.'s TCR fell 7.1 from 7.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 20.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=11.0 · 2021=18.3 · 2022=20.5 · 2023=10.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321999 · Bismarck, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 240% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P23
  • PHOTO Zeager Bros.,Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Zeager Bros.,Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Truss Systems Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Truss Systems Inc. averages 7.9 TCR (240% of the Fencing, prefabricated sections, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Truss Systems Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=11 · 2021=18.3 · 2022=20.5 · 2023=10.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Truss Systems Inc. falls in its industry

405 Fencing, prefabricated section establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Truss Systems Inc. (40 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Truss Systems Inc.
Truss Systems Inc. (40 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Truss Systems Inc. has fewer employees than the Fencing, prefabricated sections, wood, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 10.5 10.5 3 0 0
2022 20.5 6.8 6 0 0
2021 18.3 18.3 5 0 0
2020 11.0 3.7 3 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.1 7.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321999 · ND · Bismarck

405 Fencing, prefabricated sections, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 188 employers in Bismarck, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Zeager Bros.,Inc 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carris Reels McKinney, Plywood 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maine Wood Turning, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4082 - Dakota Panel Cut to size 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dakota Valley Electric Cooperative 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arrow Service Team 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anbercrombie Pipeline Services, LLC Jamestown 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dakota Spirit AgEnergy, LLC 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Bismarck-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,BISMARCK - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 1,715 FTE
CITY-NEAR 33180001-331801 ST ALEXIUS MEDICAL CENTER DBA CHI ST ALE 1,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bobcat Doosan Bismarck 1,206 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale San Ramon 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Iowa Therapy PC 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bland County Nursing and Rehab 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Noah's Ark Waterpark 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Land-Grant Brewing Company, LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE F.H. Uelner Precision Tools and Dies, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scottsdale Hangar One 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whitney-Anderson Building Group, LLC 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.