Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Ohio

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville

Zanesville, OH · ~46 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville: 4.8 TCR = 126% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville safety composite

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville: 0.0 → 116.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 116.5 TCR · DART/TCR 20.83× in 2020

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville's TCR rose 116.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 116.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 20.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Zanesville, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 126% of ind

  • DART 99.4 DART
  • RANK #107/234
  • PHOTO El Dorado Estates
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: El Dorado Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville averages 4.8 TCR (126% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=116.5 · BLS 3.8

Where TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 234 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville (46 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville
TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville (46 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 116.5 99.4 4 30 0
2019 9.2 3.1 3 0 0
2018 6.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Zanesville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 139 employers in Zanesville, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR El Dorado Estates 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avalon Square 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Oaks at Tyrone 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holthouse Farms of Ohio Inc 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Ohio Greenhouse Company 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willowbend Nurseries, LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genesis HealthCare Systems 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genesis HealthCare System 3,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zanesville DC 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0047-HES Zanesville 676 FTE
NAT-TCR Balentine Ambulance Service Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cti Foods 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson Hospital 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 507 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fire Safe Systems, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE ORC Industries, Inc. (La Crosse Main Bldg.) 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE ERSC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leon E Wintermyer, Inc. 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.