Retirement communities, continuing care · Ohio

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc.

Hudson, OH · ~249 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc.: 4.8 TCR = 126% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. safety composite

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. injury rate improved

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc.'s TCR fell 2.7 from 5.9 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 62.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=62.5 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Hudson, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 126% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #106/234
  • PHOTO El Dorado Estates
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~249 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: El Dorado Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. averages 4.8 TCR (126% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=5 · 2021=7 · 2022=62.5 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 234 Retirement communities, contin employers in Ohio.

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. (249 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc.
Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. (249 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Laurel Lake Retirement Community Inc. has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 2.6 5 0 0
2023 2.4 2.2 8 37 0
2022 62.5 61.9 5 90 0
2021 7.0 4.2 10 0 0
2020 5.0 4.4 8 1 0
2019 5.1 4.7 11 0 0
2016 5.9 3.8 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Hudson

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 40 employers in Hudson, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR El Dorado Estates 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avalon Square 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Oaks at Tyrone 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TSMM Management dba Primrose of Zanesville 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dunbar Mechanical Inc. 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cristal USA, Inc. Plant 1 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Voss Industries, LLC 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miba Bearings US, LLC 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR Little Tikes Hudson 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR LeafFilter CORP 496 FTE
CITY-NEAR MGA Entertainment 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hudson Distribution Center 375 FTE
NAT-TCR High Tech Machine 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Keeler Construction 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tile West Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Four Star Paving LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CrownQuest Operating, LLC 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Autoform Tool & Manufacturing, LLC 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mainspring Energy Headquarters 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chandler Hall Health Services 249 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.