Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Arizona

Tucson Container Corp.

Tucson, AZ · ~94 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tucson Container Corp. runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

Tucson Container Corp.: 7.2 TCR = 219% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tucson Container Corp. safety composite

Tucson Container Corp. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tucson Container Corp. held a steady TCR band

Tucson Container Corp.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 4.5 in 2018 to 4.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.5 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=9.6 · 2022=10.5 · 2023=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 219% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #13/15
  • PHOTO NAPP Vineland
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NAPP Vineland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Tucson Container Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tucson Container Corp. averages 7.2 TCR (219% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tucson Container Corp. TCR series: 2018=4.5 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=9.6 · 2022=10.5 · 2023=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Tucson Container Corp. falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 15 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Arizona.

Tucson Container Corp. (94 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Tucson Container Corp.
Tucson Container Corp. (94 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Tucson Container Corp. has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.3 4.3 4 0 0
2022 10.5 9.5 11 0 0
2021 9.6 9.6 8 0 0
2020 7.3 4.2 7 0 0
2018 4.5 1.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · AZ · Tucson

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NAPP Vineland 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peachtree Packaging, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rand-Whitney Boylston 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AGE El Paso Plant 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE MFIB 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Arizona 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Banicki Construction Company 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7319_16819 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Davis-Standard 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southland Utility Services 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Homeshield Screens - Ankeny IA 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tuttle Bakery 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marriott Dallas/Ft. Worth Westlake 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lynchburg Nursing Center 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern States Construction Service, Inc. 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Alois Alzheimer Center 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.