Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Florida

Southland Utility Services

Defuniak Springs, FL · ~58 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southland Utility Services runs at 258% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Southland Utility Services: 7.2 TCR = 258% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southland Utility Services safety composite

Southland Utility Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Southland Utility Services: 4.5 → 11.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 11.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.36× in 2023

Southland Utility Services's TCR rose 6.6 from 4.5 in 2017 to 11.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Defuniak Springs, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 258% of ind

  • DART 9.8 DART
  • RANK #89/98
  • PHOTO NSC:NSK12 - NSK12-No…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NSC:NSK12 - NSK12-North Sky - Kent, WA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Southland Utility Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southland Utility Services averages 7.2 TCR (258% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southland Utility Services TCR series: 2017=4.5 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=2 · 2020=8.6 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=11.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Southland Utility Services falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 98 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Florida.

Southland Utility Services (58 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Southland Utility Services
Southland Utility Services (58 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Southland Utility Services has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.1 9.8 7 2 0
2022 10.8 9.5 8 0 0
2020 8.6 8.6 4 1 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 6.4 0.0 3 0 0
2017 4.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · FL · Defuniak Springs

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 23 employers in Defuniak Springs, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NSC:NSK12 - NSK12-North Sky - Kent, WA 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SC200 - Montgomery 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PA031 - Pauley Construction Longmont 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-NJ-Blackwood-Lower Landing Road 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRECO - Admin 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Distribution South Campus 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA2 Golden Gate Service Center 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Public Utilities - NE Division 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1134 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZPEN 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR LP Defuniak Springs, LLC-- Chautauqua 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOCTAWHATCHEE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 160 FTE
NAT-TCR Davis-Standard 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tucson Container Corp. 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Homeshield Screens - Ankeny IA 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tuttle Bakery 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orbix dba Petol Gearench 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stutsman Transportation Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE JLM-Lawrence 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE CertainTeed 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.