Manufacture of packing and automotive components · Tennessee

Tullahoma, TN - TUL

Tullahoma, TN · ~120 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tullahoma, TN - TUL runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Manufacture of packing and automotive components workplace, earning a grade A.

Tullahoma, TN - TUL: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Manufacture of packing and automotive components BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tullahoma, TN - TUL safety composite

Tullahoma, TN - TUL scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Tullahoma, TN - TUL injury rate improved

Tullahoma, TN - TUL's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · Tullahoma, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/17
  • PHOTO Lifoam Belcamp
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lifoam Belcamp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Tullahoma, TN - TUL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tullahoma, TN - TUL averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Manufacture of packing and automotive components BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tullahoma, TN - TUL TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Tullahoma, TN - TUL falls in its industry

260 Manufacture of packing and aut establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 17 Manufacture of packing and aut employers in Tennessee.

Tullahoma, TN - TUL (120 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Tullahoma, TN - TUL
Tullahoma, TN - TUL (120 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Tullahoma, TN - TUL has more employees than the Manufacture of packing and automotive co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 8.1 1.4 3 3 0
2021 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.4 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · TN · Tullahoma

260 Manufacture of packing and automotive components employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 55 employers in Tullahoma, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lifoam Belcamp 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conyers, GA - 25 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trowbridge Drive Plant 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Packaging : BEECH ISLAND 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Knoxville 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE CECO Concrete Construction : Nashville 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE 001 Memphis TN Crane Sales and Service LLC 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nashville Stratas Foods 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAS-National Aerospace Solutions at AEDC 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR K07 ICT - Tullahoma 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 667 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR 667 282 FTE
NAT-TCR Pagoda Electrical Inc 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Volt Industrial Plastics 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dahme Mechanical Industries, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Monroe Square Assisted Living 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hughes Anderson 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Philadelphia 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0078 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lexington RSC 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.