Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Missouri

Tulley Steel and Supplies

Bridgeton, MO · ~45 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tulley Steel and Supplies runs at 337% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade F.

Tulley Steel and Supplies: 11.1 TCR = 337% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tulley Steel and Supplies safety composite

Tulley Steel and Supplies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.3

2022→2024

Tulley Steel and Supplies injury rate improved

Tulley Steel and Supplies's TCR fell 9.3 from 18.9 in 2022 to 9.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=18.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=9.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Bridgeton, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 337% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #37/41
  • PHOTO Manufacturing
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Tulley Steel and Supplies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tulley Steel and Supplies averages 11.1 TCR (337% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tulley Steel and Supplies TCR series: 2022=18.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=9.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Tulley Steel and Supplies falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 41 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Missouri.

Tulley Steel and Supplies (45 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tulley Steel and Supplies
Tulley Steel and Supplies (45 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Tulley Steel and Supplies has fewer employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.6 4.8 4 0 0
2023 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2022 18.9 16.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · MO · Bridgeton

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 131 employers in Bridgeton, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manufacturing 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swanton Welding & Machining / Heavy Fab 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poseidon Barge - Berne 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beck Steel Inc. 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 80X - Nuclear - Leadership Team 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barry Electric Cooperative, Inc. 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE 052 - Mackenzie 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Macon Electric Cooperative 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR DePaul Hospital - St. Louis 1,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hussmann Corporation- Bridgeton MFG 1,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hussmann Corporation - Bridgeton 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1188 404 FTE
NAT-TCR Mendel Plumbing & Heating 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Contracting 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR RDF Builders Co 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Le Center 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riverbend Elementary School 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dickinson County Road Commission 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Welding Services, Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clinton County Road Commission 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.