Resawing purchased lumber · Alabama

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc.

Birmingham, AL · ~45 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Resawing purchased lumber workplace, earning a grade D.

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc.: 5.6 TCR = 169% of Resawing purchased lumber BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. safety composite

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. injury rate improved

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=16.3 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321912 · Birmingham, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 169% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Bingaman & Son Lumbe…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bingaman & Son Lumber, Clarendon Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. averages 5.6 TCR (169% of the Resawing purchased lumber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=16.3 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. falls in its industry

178 Resawing purchased lumber establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Resawing purchased lumber employers in Alabama.

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc.
Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Tuscaloosa Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. has more employees than the Resawing purchased lumber median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 9.1 9.1 4 0 0
2020 16.3 6.1 8 0 0
2019 6.7 4.5 3 0 0
2018 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 4.6 4.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321912 · AL · Birmingham

178 Resawing purchased lumber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 840 employers in Birmingham, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bingaman & Son Lumber, Clarendon Division 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodcraft Industries, Inc. Greenville, PA 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fitzpatrick & Weller Inc 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sparta WoodWorks LLC 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corbitt Power & Light LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gadsden Complex - APC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gadsden Complex 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottage Builders Inc, dba as CBI Construction Services 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR USD 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLASSIC FOODS 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR BIRMINGHAM PACKERS 8,650 FTE
NAT-TCR Meyer Bros LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Creative Pultrusions 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mountain Power 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Burdick Painting 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilson Terminal 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robert Childs Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE DW Mechanical inc. 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.