Tunnel construction · California

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project

San Francisco, CA · ~96 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tunnel construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project: 5.5 TCR = 195% of Tunnel construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project safety composite

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2018→2023

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project injury rate improved

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project's TCR fell 5.5 from 5.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.5 · 2019=11.4 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 195% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #79/92
  • PHOTO R.E. Staite Engineer…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R.E. Staite Engineering (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project averages 5.5 TCR (195% of the Tunnel construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project TCR series: 2018=5.5 · 2019=11.4 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project falls in its industry

932 Tunnel construction establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 92 Tunnel construction employers in California.

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project (96 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project
Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project (96 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Tutor Perini - Central Subway Project has more employees than the Tunnel construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.1 4.8 3 0 0
2020 8.6 6.5 8 0 0
2019 11.4 10.5 23 0 0
2018 5.5 3.4 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · CA · San Francisco

932 Tunnel construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R.E. Staite Engineering 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCELVANY, INC. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR V3 Companies - Trades 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jay Dee Obayashi JV 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE SUN AND SANDS ENTERPRISES, LLC DBA PRIME TIME INTERNATIONAL 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willoughby Farms, Inc 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redding trim Shed 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUN VALLEY RAISINS, INC 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Ravenwood Specialty Care 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stratford Specialty Care 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Oahu Port of Honolulu, Pier 40 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard by Marriott Tampa Westshore/Airport 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coyote MFG Co. 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ascension At Home Milwaukee 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospice El Paso 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Michelangelo Hotel 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.