Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids

Coon Rapids, MN · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids: 1.5 TCR = 39% of Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids safety composite

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids held a steady TCR band

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Coon Rapids, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #47/419
  • PHOTO Odom Sports Medicine…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Odom Sports Medicine, PA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids averages 1.5 TCR (39% of the Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids falls in its industry

2,836 Orthopedic physicians' offices establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 419 Orthopedic physicians' offices employers in Minnesota.

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids (32 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids
Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids (32 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Coon Rapids has fewer employees than the Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., ce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · Coon Rapids

2,836 Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 155 employers in Coon Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Odom Sports Medicine, PA 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTR HEALTH OCCUPATIONAL SVCS 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graves Gilbert Clinic - OHP LR 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virtua Pulmonary - Marlton 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MN Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz SE Office 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Bridge Combined Cycle 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steele Waseca Coop Electric 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital 2,851 FTE
CITY-NEAR rms Company 1,058 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coon Rapids Customer Exp Ctr 477 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Coon Rapids 401 FTE
NAT-TCR LRS - Mayflower 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TMX2410 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CC AKS Steel 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kastalon Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1482 West Genesee Road, Baldwinsville NY 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forever Green Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE J & B Steel Erectors, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ultra Incorporated 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.