Reconditioning shipping barrels and drums · Minnesota

Twin City Container, Inc.

Cannon Falls, MN · ~52 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Twin City Container, Inc. runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Reconditioning shipping barrels and drums workplace, earning a grade B.

Twin City Container, Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 78% of Reconditioning shipping barrels and drums BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Twin City Container, Inc. safety composite

Twin City Container, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Twin City Container, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Twin City Container, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Cannon Falls, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/56
  • PHOTO Smith Power Products…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smith Power Products Inc. (Hobbs) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Twin City Container, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Twin City Container, Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (78% of the Reconditioning shipping barrels and drums BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Twin City Container, Inc. TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Twin City Container, Inc. falls in its industry

2,560 Reconditioning shipping barrel establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 56 Reconditioning shipping barrel employers in Minnesota.

Twin City Container, Inc. (52 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Twin City Container, Inc.
Twin City Container, Inc. (52 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Twin City Container, Inc. has more employees than the Reconditioning shipping barrels and drum median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.7 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MN · Cannon Falls

2,560 Reconditioning shipping barrels and drums employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 23 employers in Cannon Falls, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smith Power Products Inc. (Hobbs) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mid Ohio Material Handling, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alta Enterprises LLC- Binghamton 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kiemle-Hankins - ALL 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hutchinson Utilities Commission 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasella Concrete, Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bargen Incorporated 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheehy Construction Company 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkel US Operations Corp 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gemini Cannon Falls 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkel US Operations Corporation - Cannon Falls, MN 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Cannon Falls 188 FTE
NAT-TCR Delta Air Lines - OKC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Heat Treating Services Plant 3 South 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunesta Awnings - (aka Gibraltar Industries) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Condor Fire Spinkler Co., LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Asphalt Recycling and Stabilization, Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hardin Industries LLC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Roofing, A Tecta America Company, LLC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dewar Nurseries, Inc. Mount Dora 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.