Nursing homes · Pennsylvania

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Greensburg, PA · ~194 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center: 9.3 TCR = 143% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center safety composite

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2023→2024

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center injury rate improved

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's TCR fell 8.0 from 13.3 in 2023 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=13.3 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Greensburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.3 · 143% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #509/754
  • PHOTO Orange Healthcare & …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~194 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orange Healthcare & Wellness Centre (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center averages 9.3 TCR (143% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center TCR series: 2023=13.3 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #509 safest of 754 Nursing homes employers in Pennsylvania.

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center (194 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center (194 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 5.3 6 0 0
2023 13.3 11.3 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Greensburg

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 129 employers in Greensburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orange Healthcare & Wellness Centre 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington Village Estates 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Chico Creek Care and Rehabilitation Center 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Englewood Post-Acute & Rehabilitation 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bickel's Snack Foods 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunbury Textile Mills, Inc. 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Equipment Depot Pennsylvania, Inc. 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stein Seal Company Incorporated 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westmoreland Hospital 1,943 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westmoreland Regional Hospital 1,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Penn Power 695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott Electric 663 FTE
NAT-TCR Modesto Springhill Suite 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Haven Steel Products 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EB Care at Farmingville 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 2489 Val38 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Knust-Godwin LLC 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE LifeLine Ambulance 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doehler USA INc 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Water's Edge Center for Health & Rehabilitation 194 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.