Nursing homes · Connecticut

Meriden Center

Name: Meriden Center Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Meriden, CT · ~89 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 9.3
Avg TCR: 6.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meriden Center runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Meriden Center: 9.3 TCR = 143% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meriden Center safety composite

Meriden Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 9.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers
DART rate: D 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2020

Meriden Center injury rate improved

Meriden Center's TCR fell 5.0 from 9.8 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.8 · 2017=16.1 · 2018=6.5 · 2020=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Meriden, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.3 · 143% of ind

DART 3.6 DART
RANK #119/258
PHOTO Twin Lakes Rehabilit…
BOOK 4y book
INJ 34 inj
SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

This site

9.3
Twin Lakes Reh

9.3
Orange Healthc

9.3
Washington Vil

9.3
Windsor Chico

9.3

What this shows Meriden Center averages 9.3 TCR (143% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Meriden Center TCR series: 2016=9.8 · 2017=16.1 · 2018=6.5 · 2020=4.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Meriden Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #119 safest of 258 Nursing homes employers in Connecticut.

Meriden Center (89 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Meriden Center has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2020	4.8	3.6	4
2018	6.5	3.9	5
2017	16.1	6.9	14
2016	9.8	5.3	11

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CT · Meriden

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 115 employers in Meriden, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	GREENSBURG, PA	9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Orange Healthcare & Wellness Centre	ORANGE, CA	9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Washington Village Estates	WASHINGTON, IL	9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Windsor Chico Creek Care and Rehabilitation Center	CHICO, CA	9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Waters Construction Company, Inc.	BRIDGEPORT	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	MPH	HAMDEN	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Kim Industries Inc.	NEWTOWN,	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	021 - Naugatuck	NAUGATUCK	89 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Hartford	Meriden	1,670 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MIDSTATE MEDICAL CENTER	Meriden	1,220 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MRDNCT04	Meriden	566 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Radio Frequency Systems - Meriden, CT	Meriden	402 FTE
NAT-TCR	Ctv 51	Toms River, NJ	9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	4769-6124-West Elm	Palm Springs, CA	9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sundial Assisted Living	Redding, CA	9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	KC Jones Plating	Hazel Park, MI	9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Warehouse 18	Independence, MO	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	1855-MIDET530	Novi, MI	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Stonebridge at Burlington	Burlington, MA	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Boyer's Food Markets -Womelsdorf	Womelsdorf, PA	89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.