Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges · Kansas

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation

Kansas City, KS · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation runs at 423% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges workplace, earning a grade F.

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation: 11.8 TCR = 423% of Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation safety composite

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation: 11.1 → 19.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 19.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2021

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation's TCR rose 8.5 from 11.1 in 2016 to 19.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Kansas City, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 423% of ind

  • DART 13.1 DART
  • RANK #49/49
  • PHOTO D7 Mattoon Yard
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D7 Mattoon Yard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Twin Traffic Marking Corporation averages 11.8 TCR (423% of the Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation TCR series: 2016=11.1 · 2017=9.2 · 2018=15.9 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=19.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Twin Traffic Marking Corporation falls in its industry

4,078 Painting lines on highways, st establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 49 Painting lines on highways, st employers in Kansas.

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation (28 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Twin Traffic Marking Corporation
Twin Traffic Marking Corporation (28 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Twin Traffic Marking Corporation has fewer employees than the Painting lines on highways, streets and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 19.6 13.1 6 0 0
2020 11.3 11.3 2 1 0
2019 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 15.9 12.0 4 0 0
2017 9.2 9.2 2 0 0
2016 11.1 11.1 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · KS · Kansas City

4,078 Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 367 employers in Kansas City, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D7 Mattoon Yard 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trierweiler Construction Supply Co.,Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TPW - Airport Yard 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MDOT MAINT GAR AUBURN HLS-MDOT 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brookover Ranch Feed Yard 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Satanta Farms North #2 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hefier Source, LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookover Feed Yard Scott City 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MKC6 3,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MKC6 2,912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfax Assembly and Stamping 2,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR PROVIDENCE MEDICAL CENTER 1,091 FTE
NAT-TCR Huntington University 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bickford of Bexley 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Turlock Residential 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jefferson City Retirement LLC dba Primrose of Jefferson City 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Milestone Senior Living Woodruff 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thrift Store Watsonville 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ortiz Service Center 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milestone Senior Living Eau Claire 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.