Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Tyrrell House

Columbia, NC · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tyrrell House runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Tyrrell House: 1.5 TCR = 40% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tyrrell House safety composite

Tyrrell House scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tyrrell House held a steady TCR band

Tyrrell House's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbia, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/356
  • PHOTO High Point Village
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: High Point Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Tyrrell House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tyrrell House averages 1.5 TCR (40% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tyrrell House TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Tyrrell House falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Tyrrell House (35 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Tyrrell House
Tyrrell House (35 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Tyrrell House has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 11.2 2.8 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Columbia

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 6 employers in Columbia, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR High Point Village 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Frontida Inc 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial Services/Interstate 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vitality Living Frederica 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boykin Farms, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEW COLONY SOW FARM 6276 -EST 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsboro Field Services 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butterball LLC Hatchery # 2 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR 02110 - STORE # 2110 COLUMBIA 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2110 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Black Gold Farms - NCC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store #54 Duck Thru 21 FTE
NAT-TCR American Museum of Natural History 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR McNaughton-McKay Electric Company - Michigan Region - Madison Heights, MI 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Zarvona Energy LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR American Wilcon Plastics - Air Vent - Orrick 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stenstrom Protanic 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosara Investments, LLC Ea05 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Upper Marlboro, MD - 16060 Leeland Rd 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adventure Supermarket, LLC Ea19 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.