Application service providers (ASPs) · Pennsylvania

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site

Pittsburgh, PA · ~95 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Application service providers (ASPs) workplace, earning a grade B.

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site: 0.3 TCR = 50% of Application service providers (ASPs) BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site safety composite

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2018

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site injury rate improved

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 518210 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.3 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/14
  • PHOTO Advertising Specialt…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advertising Specialty Institute (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site averages 0.3 TCR (50% of the Application service providers (ASPs) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site falls in its industry

180 Application service providers establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 14 Application service providers employers in Pennsylvania.

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site (95 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 182 employees and a TCR of 0.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site
Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site (95 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 182 employees and a TCR of 0.6

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Almono Test Site has fewer employees than the Application service providers (ASPs) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

518210 · PA · Pittsburgh

180 Application service providers (ASPs) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advertising Specialty Institute 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CDS Global Boone 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LOCATION 50004 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LOCATION 19013 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 301-NiSource-Uniontown PA 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE DL George and Sons Manufacturing Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Systems, Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Field 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Nestle Nutrition USA, Gateway 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mersen Salem 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aetna Specialty Pharmacy LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vermont Yankee 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Caraustar Mill 2 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Associated Milk Producers Inc (Blair) 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE BPI Technology, Inc. - Corporate Office 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.