Application service providers (ASPs) · Pennsylvania

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center

Pittsburgh, PA · ~59 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Application service providers (ASPs) workplace, earning a grade C.

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Application service providers (ASPs) BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center safety composite

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center held a steady TCR band

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 518210 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/14
  • PHOTO Pure Storage
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pure Storage (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Application service providers (ASPs) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center falls in its industry

180 Application service providers establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 14 Application service providers employers in Pennsylvania.

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center (59 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 182 employees and a TCR of 0.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center
Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center (59 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 182 employees and a TCR of 0.6

Uber Technologies, Inc.- ATG Paragon Pittsburgh Operations Center has fewer employees than the Application service providers (ASPs) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

518210 · PA · Pittsburgh

180 Application service providers (ASPs) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pure Storage 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LinkedIn San Francisco 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LOCATION 45018 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LinkedIn Mountain View / Sunnyvale 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Creek Nurseries, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eddystone Generating Station 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&A Homes, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kessler Marketing Group, Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edwards Wood Products - Alamance Plant 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Open Systems Healthcare - WPB 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Swedish Institute 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.