Sidewalk construction, residential and commercial · Florida

UCC Group Southeast

Orlando, FL · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UCC Group Southeast runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Sidewalk construction, residential and commercial workplace, earning a grade A.

UCC Group Southeast: 0.7 TCR = 25% of Sidewalk construction, residential and commercial BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UCC Group Southeast safety composite

UCC Group Southeast scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

UCC Group Southeast held a steady TCR band

UCC Group Southeast's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/106
  • PHOTO Dallas Location
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dallas Location (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

UCC Group Southeast in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UCC Group Southeast averages 0.7 TCR (25% of the Sidewalk construction, residential and commercial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UCC Group Southeast TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where UCC Group Southeast falls in its industry

1,634 Sidewalk construction, residen establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 106 Sidewalk construction, residen employers in Florida.

UCC Group Southeast (37 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate UCC Group Southeast
UCC Group Southeast (37 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

UCC Group Southeast has fewer employees than the Sidewalk construction, residential and c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · FL · Orlando

1,634 Sidewalk construction, residential and commercial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dallas Location 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR A-Core of Boise 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 005 Mobile AL Barnhart Crane and Rigging LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knighto, LLC 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE TransGro 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packinghouse 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Park Service Center 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gladiolus Service Center 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fall River Manufacturing Company 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Cruz CA Home Center 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NineStar Connect-North Campus 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE RAM 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guilford County Court Alternatives - Juvenile Detention 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Geary Electric Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alliance BNSF - AAW 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.