Thermoforming · New York

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012

Chatham, NY · ~74 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Thermoforming workplace, earning a grade A.

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Thermoforming BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 safety composite

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2016→2024

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 injury rate improved

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012's TCR fell 5.7 from 5.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Chatham, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/87
  • PHOTO American Molding and…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Molding and Technologies Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Thermoforming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 falls in its industry

2,838 Thermoforming establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 87 Thermoforming employers in New York.

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 (74 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012
Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 (74 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Chatham, NY - Global Plastics- Injection - F012 has fewer employees than the Thermoforming median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.7 0.0 0 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NY · Chatham

2,838 Thermoforming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 7 employers in Chatham, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Molding and Technologies Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Noble Plastics Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nypro, Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leading Edge Countertops 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BENNETT CONTRACTING II, LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henegan Construction Co., Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAP Leasing Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connors Haas Inc. 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chatham Family Care 1,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chatham & Ghent Family Care 1,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hudson River Tractor Company - Chatham 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYSEG Chatham 19 FTE
NAT-TCR UCC Group Southeast 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fall River Manufacturing Company 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Cruz CA Home Center 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NineStar Connect-North Campus 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #6519 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #4133 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Region 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE RC Highway 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.