Dental laboratories · Minnesota

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc

St Louis Park, MN · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Dental laboratories workplace, earning a grade D.

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc: 6.0 TCR = 182% of Dental laboratories BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc safety composite

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc held a steady TCR band

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc's TCR held near 0.1 from 10.2 in 2016 to 10.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.2 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=10.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339116 · St Louis Park, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 182% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO Renstrom Dental Studio
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Renstrom Dental Studio (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc averages 6.0 TCR (182% of the Dental laboratories BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc TCR series: 2016=10.2 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=10.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc falls in its industry

184 Dental laboratories establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Dental laboratories employers in Minnesota.

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc (33 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc
Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc (33 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Udell Dental Laboratory, Inc has fewer employees than the Dental laboratories median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.2 6.8 3 0 0
2023 7.6 7.6 2 0 0
2022 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.8 6.8 2 0 0
2017 13.2 6.6 4 0 0
2016 10.2 6.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339116 · MN · St Louis Park

184 Dental laboratories employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 57 employers in St Louis Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Renstrom Dental Studio 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apex Dental Laboratory of Eau Claire 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Digitech 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NDX LUMIDENT DENTAL LAB 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perham Egg LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gorans Brothers Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Las Vegas Raiders 17150004 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loeffler Construction & Consulting 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR PNMH ST LOUIS PARK METHODIST HOSP 2,916 FTE
CITY-NEAR PN1N ST LOUIS PARK 3800 BLDG 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR city of st. louis park 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northland Aluminum Products, Inc 444 FTE
NAT-TCR Sentara Williamsburg Regional Medical Center 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Diversicare of Bessemer 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Moana Surfrider, A Westin Resort 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE AWSI 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willow Construction, LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suddath Global Logistics, LLC (803) 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Circleville 1222 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.