Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Minnesota
Champion Window of Minneapolis
Minneapolis, MN · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 27.6
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Champion Window of Minneapolis runs at 835% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 27.6
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 8
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Champion Window of Minneapolis's OSHA Total Case Rate of 27.6 to the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (835% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Champion Window of Minneapolis's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Champion Window of Minneapolis falls in its industry
220 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishmentsSafer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in Minnesota.
Trend analysis for Champion Window of Minneapolis
Between 2023 and 2024, Champion Window of Minneapolis's Total Case Rate worsened from 24.5 to 30.6 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 25% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2023, at a TCR of 24.5, while 2024 saw the highest rate, at 30.6, a spread of 6.2 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Champion Window of Minneapolis recorded 8 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 8 injuries shown on this page for Champion Window of Minneapolis are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 326121 - Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 26,103 hours worked = 15.32 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Champion Window of Minneapolis (this establishment) | 27.57 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 326121 |
| Minnesota state avg (all industries) | 5.18 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Champion Window of Minneapolis to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30.6 | 15.3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 24.5 | 18.4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Champion Window of Minneapolis's reported OSHA injury record versus its Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 835% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing benchmark, Champion Window of Minneapolis reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Champion Window of Minneapolis's safety grade?
How many injuries has Champion Window of Minneapolis reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Minnesota, and by nearby establishments in Minneapolis - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~27.6)
Similar size (~33 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.