Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Minnesota

Champion Window of Minneapolis

Minneapolis, MN · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
27.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champion Window of Minneapolis runs at 835% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Champion Window of Minneapolis: 27.6 TCR = 835% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champion Window of Minneapolis safety composite

Champion Window of Minneapolis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 27.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Champion Window of Minneapolis: 24.5 → 30.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 30.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2024

Champion Window of Minneapolis's TCR rose 6.2 from 24.5 in 2023 to 30.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 27.6 · 835% of ind

  • DART 15.3 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Custom Extrusions LL…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Custom Extrusions LLC dba Alliance Plastics (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Champion Window of Minneapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champion Window of Minneapolis averages 27.6 TCR (835% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champion Window of Minneapolis TCR series: 2023=24.5 · 2024=30.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Champion Window of Minneapolis falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in Minnesota.

Champion Window of Minneapolis (33 employees, TCR 27.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Champion Window of Minneapolis
Champion Window of Minneapolis (33 employees, TCR 27.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Champion Window of Minneapolis has fewer employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 30.6 15.3 4 0 0
2023 24.5 18.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · MN · Minneapolis

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Custom Extrusions LLC dba Alliance Plastics 27.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champion Window of Columbia 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR UMR Board Productions LLC 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FINGER LAKES EXTRUSION 17.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perham Egg LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gorans Brothers Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Las Vegas Raiders 17150004 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loeffler Construction & Consulting 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR The Residence at Quarry Hill 27.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0205 Marina Del Rey 27.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0529 Stamford 27.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kokomo Healthcare Center 27.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Hampton Cove 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Scotts Company - Olivehurst 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Scotts Company - Morrison 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Warehouse 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.