Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities) · Tennessee

UETHDA

Kingsport, TN · ~235 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UETHDA runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities) workplace, earning a grade B.

UETHDA: 2.6 TCR = 69% of Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UETHDA safety composite

UETHDA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2022→2024

UETHDA injury rate improved

UETHDA's TCR fell 1.3 from 4.3 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.3 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Kingsport, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 69% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #7/26
  • PHOTO Habitat for Humanity…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~235 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Habitat for Humanity-MidOhio (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

UETHDA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UETHDA averages 2.6 TCR (69% of the Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UETHDA TCR series: 2022=4.3 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.8

Where UETHDA falls in its industry

990 Self-help organizations (excep establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 26 Self-help organizations (excep employers in Tennessee.

UETHDA (235 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate UETHDA
UETHDA (235 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

UETHDA has more employees than the Self-help organizations (except for disa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 5 0 0
2023 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.3 0.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · TN · Kingsport

990 Self-help organizations (except for disabled persons, the elderly, persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 152 employers in Kingsport, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Habitat for Humanity-MidOhio 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Rescue Mission Inc. Veterans Parkway Retail & Donation Center 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR IMPACT Community Action 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 33-00 Northern Blvd 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lendlease CICBU 235 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wonder Porcelain Group LLC 235 FTE
STATE-SIZE Memphis MFS 235 FTE
STATE-SIZE FedEx 2955 REPUBLICAN 235 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Kingsport Site 7,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holston Valley Medical Center 1,733 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company Kinsport TN- BSL 1,206 FTE
CITY-NEAR BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - VA 1,073 FTE
NAT-TCR The Sign Bros, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pedowitz Machinery Movers of Connecticut 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Monroe Construction, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CalPortland Company 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Veterans Memorial Hospital 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sysco Iowa, Inc 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nazareth Living Center 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industry Products Company 235 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.