General Warehousing , Goods and Storage · South Carolina
Ulta Beauty GRR
Greer, SC · ~450 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 3.1
- Avg TCR
- 5.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Ulta Beauty GRR runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Warehousing , Goods and Storage workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 3.1
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 5.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 15
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Ulta Beauty GRR's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
Ulta Beauty GRR's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 5.8 industry benchmark.
Where Ulta Beauty GRR falls in its industry
10,728 General Warehousing , Goods an establishmentsSafer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.
Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 183 General Warehousing , Goods an employers in South Carolina.
Ulta Beauty GRR has an average TCR of 3.1, which is 53% of the industry average (5.8) for General Warehousing , Goods and Storage. This is better than average.
The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.
Trend analysis for Ulta Beauty GRR
Between 2023 and 2024, Ulta Beauty GRR's Total Case Rate worsened from 2.9 to 3.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 12% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2023, at a TCR of 2.9, while 2024 saw the highest rate, at 3.3, a spread of 0.4 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Ulta Beauty GRR recorded 15 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Ulta Beauty GRR's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 493110 - General Warehousing , Goods and Storage.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
9 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 613,370 hours worked = 2.93 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Ulta Beauty GRR (this establishment) | 3.08 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Warehousing and storage, general merchandise industry avg | 5.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 493110 |
| South Carolina state avg (all industries) | 4.08 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Ulta Beauty GRR to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 10 reportable incidents · 10 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Ulta Beauty GRR's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its General Warehousing , Goods and Storage peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 53% of the General Warehousing , Goods and Storage benchmark, Ulta Beauty GRR reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider General Warehousing , Goods and Storage sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ulta Beauty GRR's safety grade?
How many injuries has Ulta Beauty GRR reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within South Carolina - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~3.1)
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.