Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · North Carolina

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care

Greensboro, NC · ~39 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care: 1.6 TCR = 41% of Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care safety composite

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2017→2023

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care injury rate improved

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care's TCR fell 6.2 from 6.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #34/152
  • PHOTO SVH Kanza Ortho
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SVH Kanza Ortho (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care averages 1.6 TCR (41% of the Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care TCR series: 2017=6.2 · 2018=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care falls in its industry

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e. establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 152 Family physicians' offices (e. employers in North Carolina.

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care (39 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care
UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care (39 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

UMF-Urgent Medical and Family Care has fewer employees than the Family physicians' offices (e.g., center median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.2 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · NC · Greensboro

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SVH Kanza Ortho 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1880 Commerce St. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0210 BLOOMINGTON CLINIC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Pacific Medical Foundation (272-MF-SON) 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE B & S Farming, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jeffery C Lee Farms, INC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sullivan Farms Inc. 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR 022 Monessen, PA (RDC) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR General Recycling of MS, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fluid Connectors : Albion 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Child and Family Guidance Center 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 034-Odessa/N Grant 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE 108-Canyon Lake/Fm 2673 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fonda Specialty Care 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE 04-22-02 Northeast Div - Chesapeake Region 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.