Schools, professional (colleges or universities) · Oregon

Umpqua Community College

Roseburg, OR · ~366 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Umpqua Community College runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Schools, professional (colleges or universities) workplace, earning a grade D.

Umpqua Community College: 2.1 TCR = 147% of Schools, professional (colleges or universities) BLS 1.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Umpqua Community College safety composite

Umpqua Community College scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Umpqua Community College: 0.8 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.2× in 2024

Umpqua Community College's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.8 in 2020 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611310 · Roseburg, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.1 · 147% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Northwest Technical …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~366 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northwest Technical College (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Umpqua Community College in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Umpqua Community College averages 2.1 TCR (147% of the Schools, professional (colleges or universities) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Umpqua Community College TCR series: 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=4.9 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 1.4

Where Umpqua Community College falls in its industry

347 Schools, professional (college establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Schools, professional (college employers in Oregon.

Umpqua Community College (366 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Umpqua Community College
Umpqua Community College (366 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Umpqua Community College has fewer employees than the Schools, professional (colleges or unive median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.4 4 0 0
2022 4.9 1.0 7 3 0
2021 0.9 0.5 3 1 0
2020 0.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611310 · OR · Roseburg

347 Schools, professional (colleges or universities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 125 employers in Roseburg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northwest Technical College 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR University of Kentucky - Main Campus - Fayette County 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISU - University Wide 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cardinal IG -Hood River IG 366 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Oregon Truck Company 366 FTE
STATE-SIZE Department of Public Safety Standards and Training 366 FTE
STATE-SIZE Multnomah County Bldg 314 Inverness Jail 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Outpatient Lab 5,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foundation, Community Education, Healthy Kids 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine - Mercy Imaging 1,022 FTE
NAT-TCR Greenville Metals inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Landscape Associate of WNY, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Clickstop, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Services of Sullivan 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE LMR Farm Labor Inc 1 366 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mickey Truck Bodies 366 FTE
NAT-SIZE BERRYMONR 366 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sysco Minnesota 366 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.