Precious metals recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals · Pennsylvania

Greenville Metals inc

Transfer, PA · ~77 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenville Metals inc runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Precious metals recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals workplace, earning a grade B.

Greenville Metals inc: 2.1 TCR = 62% of Precious metals recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenville Metals inc safety composite

Greenville Metals inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2024

Greenville Metals inc injury rate improved

Greenville Metals inc's TCR fell 4.4 from 4.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=1.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331492 · Transfer, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/25
  • PHOTO US Zinc Houston Dust
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: US Zinc Houston Dust (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Greenville Metals inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenville Metals inc averages 2.1 TCR (62% of the Precious metals recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenville Metals inc TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=2 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=2 · 2022=1.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Greenville Metals inc falls in its industry

132 Precious metals recovering fro establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 25 Precious metals recovering fro employers in Pennsylvania.

Greenville Metals inc (77 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenville Metals inc
Greenville Metals inc (77 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Greenville Metals inc has more employees than the Precious metals recovering from scrap an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2019 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2018 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.0 0.0 1 1 0
2016 4.4 2.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331492 · PA · Transfer

132 Precious metals recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR US Zinc Houston Dust 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Zinc Recycling - Calumet 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forest City Facility LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATI Specialty Materials - Bakers Powder 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Middletown Egg 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Lancaster 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transwall Office Systems 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reynolds Enterprises, Inc. - Reynolds Construction, LLC (Harrisburg) 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edgewood Surgical Hospital 61 FTE
NAT-TCR Umpqua Community College 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Landscape Associate of WNY, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Clickstop, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Services of Sullivan 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Canfield Healthcare Center 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grover Corporation 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zak Dirt, Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raley's 242-Yuba City 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.