Construction management, oil and gas pipeline · California

Underground Construction - Main

Benicia, CA · ~625 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Underground Construction - Main runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, oil and gas pipeline workplace, earning a grade A.

Underground Construction - Main: 1.0 TCR = 35% of Construction management, oil and gas pipeline BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Underground Construction - Main safety composite

Underground Construction - Main scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2021

Underground Construction - Main injury rate improved

Underground Construction - Main's TCR fell 0.9 from 1.7 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Benicia, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #30/45
  • PHOTO Ligon & Ligon, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~625 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ligon & Ligon, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Underground Construction - Main in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Underground Construction - Main averages 1.0 TCR (35% of the Construction management, oil and gas pipeline BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Underground Construction - Main TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Underground Construction - Main falls in its industry

809 Construction management, oil a establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 45 Construction management, oil a employers in California.

Underground Construction - Main (625 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Underground Construction - Main
Underground Construction - Main (625 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Underground Construction - Main has more employees than the Construction management, oil and gas pip median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.8 0.7 6 0 0
2020 0.7 0.3 4 0 0
2019 0.6 0.4 4 0 0
2018 1.3 0.7 5 4 0
2017 0.8 0.2 4 0 0
2016 1.7 1.4 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · CA · Benicia

809 Construction management, oil and gas pipeline employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 91 employers in Benicia, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ligon & Ligon, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PG&E 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schmid Pipeline Construction Inc 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Equix Energy Services, LLC - Midway 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alcon Research, LLC. 625 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA - H and M 625 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coursera, Inc. 625 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shriners Hospitals for Children Northern California 625 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 484 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 111 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bio-Rad Laboratories Benicia Campus 649 FTE
CITY-NEAR Underground Construction Co Inc 516 FTE
NAT-TCR Axcelis Beverly 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Head Start-South Point 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR KHA 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Newseum Catering 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harrison Steel Plant 625 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rio Mar Beach Grand Resort and Spa 625 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prairie Island Nuclear Plant 625 FTE
NAT-SIZE LexaMar Corporation 625 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.