Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee based), manufacturing · New Jersey

Ungerer & Company

Lincoln Park, NJ · ~113 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ungerer & Company runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee based), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Ungerer & Company: 0.7 TCR = 17% of Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee based), manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ungerer & Company safety composite

Ungerer & Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2024

Ungerer & Company injury rate improved

Ungerer & Company's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.4 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311930 · Lincoln Park, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/13
  • PHOTO KanPak Arkansas City…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KanPak Arkansas City whse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Ungerer & Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ungerer & Company averages 0.7 TCR (17% of the Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee based), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ungerer & Company TCR series: 2017=1.4 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.1

Where Ungerer & Company falls in its industry

96 Concentrates, flavoring (excep establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 13 Concentrates, flavoring (excep employers in New Jersey.

Ungerer & Company (113 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ungerer & Company
Ungerer & Company (113 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Ungerer & Company has more employees than the Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee b median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.4 0.7 5 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311930 · NJ · Lincoln Park

96 Concentrates, flavoring (except coffee based), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 10 employers in Lincoln Park, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KanPak Arkansas City whse 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Citromax Group 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Erlanger Wild Flavors 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SensoryEffects Bridgeton 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hamon Custodis, Inc. 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orora Visual NJ 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quincy Compressor LLC (Northeast Region) 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE II-VI AMD Pine Brook 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR ShopRite of Lincoln Park, Inc. 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Infrastructure Repair Service 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Richelieu America Lincoln Park NJ 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Lift Truck Co., Inc. Br15 36 FTE
NAT-TCR Homegrown Organic Farms 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Satco Inc 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Harbour Contractors, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wagner Millwork, LLC 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crane Engineering 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bullen Ultrasonics, Inc. 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Exceptional Opportunities, Inc. 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.