Antitoxins manufacturing · Georgia

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center

Augusta, GA · ~174 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Antitoxins manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Antitoxins manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center safety composite

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2024

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325414 · Augusta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO Atara Biotherapeutic…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Union Agener Augusta Technology Center averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Antitoxins manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Union Agener Augusta Technology Center falls in its industry

234 Antitoxins manufacturing establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Antitoxins manufacturing employers in Georgia.

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center (174 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Union Agener Augusta Technology Center
Union Agener Augusta Technology Center (174 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Union Agener Augusta Technology Center has fewer employees than the Antitoxins manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.6 2 1 0
2023 2.3 1.1 4 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 2 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325414 · GA · Augusta

234 Antitoxins manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 373 employers in Augusta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Chemical Advanced Therapeutics Solutions 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Matrivax Research and Development Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Location's) 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Estes Services 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valdosta Roll Facility 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Club Chef LLC - ATL 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA COKE 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AU Medical Center, Inc. 5,630 FTE
NAT-TCR Regency Pacific Management, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Almstead Tree & Shrub Care Company - New Rochelle, NY 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Caltronics Design & Assembly Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Midland County 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mannkind Corporation 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE NV Branch 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnstown 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buffalo Wire Works 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.