Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Illinois

Union School District

Joliet, IL · ~32 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Union School District runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade D.

Union School District: 5.6 TCR = 188% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Union School District safety composite

Union School District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Union School District: 0.0 → 15.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 15.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Union School District's TCR rose 15.8 from 0.0 in 2018 to 15.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Joliet, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 188% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #241/364
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT RVP 316 IN…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT RVP 316 INDIRECT SUPPORT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Union School District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Union School District averages 5.6 TCR (188% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Union School District TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=6.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=15.8 · BLS 3.0

Where Union School District falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #241 safest of 364 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Illinois.

Union School District (32 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Union School District
Union School District (32 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Union School District has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 15.8 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · IL · Joliet

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 281 employers in Joliet, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT RVP 316 INDIRECT SUPPORT 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEICO-GETZVILLE-MARKET C W/HOT FOOD** 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT USHR LONGWORTH FOOD COURT 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT SHARP MEMORIAL CAFE 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Eastern 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utility Department 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - AIC Gas Corrosion 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE NG Ottawa Reporting Center 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Of Will 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 2,361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MDW2 2,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presence Saint Joseph Medical Center, Joliet 2,089 FTE
NAT-TCR Dubois 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1023 - Kendall Fl Whse 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 0351 - Fort Meyers Fl Whse 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Birchwood Foods 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE LAFAYETTE 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Expert Services Utah Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Two Men And A Truck West Palm Beach 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill of Colorado - Loveland 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.