Scaffold erecting and dismantling · New Jersey

Unique Scaffolding Systems

Kenilworth, NJ · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Unique Scaffolding Systems runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Scaffold erecting and dismantling workplace, earning a grade B.

Unique Scaffolding Systems: 1.8 TCR = 65% of Scaffold erecting and dismantling BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Unique Scaffolding Systems safety composite

Unique Scaffolding Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Unique Scaffolding Systems: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.41× in 2024

Unique Scaffolding Systems's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Kenilworth, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 65% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #17/36
  • PHOTO Champion Painting Sp…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Champion Painting Specialty Services Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Unique Scaffolding Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Unique Scaffolding Systems averages 1.8 TCR (65% of the Scaffold erecting and dismantling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Unique Scaffolding Systems TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=3 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Unique Scaffolding Systems falls in its industry

1,634 Scaffold erecting and dismantl establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 36 Scaffold erecting and dismantl employers in New Jersey.

Unique Scaffolding Systems (39 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Unique Scaffolding Systems
Unique Scaffolding Systems (39 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Unique Scaffolding Systems has fewer employees than the Scaffold erecting and dismantling median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2021 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · NJ · Kenilworth

1,634 Scaffold erecting and dismantling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 21 employers in Kenilworth, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Champion Painting Specialty Services Corp. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NATIONAL CONCRETE AND PAVING LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buesing Corppration 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Patriot General Engineering. Inc 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oishii Farm Corporation 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLF-Stable, LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Jersey Gas-Cape May 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Jersey American Water- Delran Production 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kenilworth, NJ Facility 2,168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kenilworth 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-01096 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0034-0034-01096 FAC-01096-KENILWORTH-NJ 148 FTE
NAT-TCR Dallas 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliable Products, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dc1 & Dc2 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cadillac Renewable Energy 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pinetop Region One 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABM 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kerotest Manufacturing Corp. Pittsburgh, PA 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.