Auto salvage yards (i.e., retailing used auto parts) · Michigan

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc

Flint, MI · ~39 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Auto salvage yards (i.e., retailing used auto parts) workplace, earning a grade D.

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc: 6.1 TCR = 180% of Auto salvage yards (i.e., retailing used auto parts) BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc safety composite

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2016→2024

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc injury rate improved

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc's TCR fell 10.5 from 12.8 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.8 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441310 · Flint, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 180% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #16/22
  • PHOTO 000012-DALLAS TX
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 000012-DALLAS TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc averages 6.1 TCR (180% of the Auto salvage yards (i.e., retailing used auto parts) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc TCR series: 2016=12.8 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=3 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=5 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.4

Where Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc falls in its industry

1,258 Auto salvage yards (i.e., reta establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 22 Auto salvage yards (i.e., reta employers in Michigan.

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc (39 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 30 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc
Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc (39 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 30 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Complete Auto and Truck Parts Inc has more employees than the Auto salvage yards (i.e., retailing used median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2022 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2021 12.9 7.7 5 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 8.4 5.6 3 0 0
2018 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 12.8 6.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441310 · MI · Flint

1,258 Auto salvage yards (i.e., retailing used auto parts) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 260 employers in Flint, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 000012-DALLAS TX 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 5673 - Florissant 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAP Winston Salem 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CITY AUTO SUPPLY - SSF 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Hope Dairy 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFI - Livonia 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dart Facilities 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cripps Fontaine Excavating, INC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Flint Truck Assembly 5,164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Assembly 3,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hurley Medical Center 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Flint 2,477 FTE
NAT-TCR PA - Aliquippa 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NCSP Holdco, LLC 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rutherford-Eagleville 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CBI 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE ABM 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unique Scaffolding Systems 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anchor Tampa, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE U.S. Axle, Inc. 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.