Display instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing · Massachusetts

United Electric Controls

Watertown, MA · ~138 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Electric Controls runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Display instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

United Electric Controls: 5.0 TCR = 150% of Display instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Electric Controls safety composite

United Electric Controls scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

United Electric Controls: 2.8 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 25.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.37× in 2024

United Electric Controls's TCR rose 0.9 from 2.8 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 25.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Watertown, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 150% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #21/21
  • PHOTO Dwyer Instruments In…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dwyer Instruments Inc - South Bend IN (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

United Electric Controls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Electric Controls averages 5.0 TCR (150% of the Display instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Electric Controls TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=25.3 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where United Electric Controls falls in its industry

322 Display instruments, industria establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 21 Display instruments, industria employers in Massachusetts.

United Electric Controls (138 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate United Electric Controls
United Electric Controls (138 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

United Electric Controls has more employees than the Display instruments, industrial process median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 1.8 3 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 3.8 3.0 5 0 0
2017 25.3 16.9 3 0 0
2016 2.8 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · MA · Watertown

322 Display instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 43 employers in Watertown, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dwyer Instruments Inc - South Bend IN 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIRATECH_Knoxville 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Montalvo Corporation 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Photo-Sonics, Inc. 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nappa Home Office 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Professional Drywall Construction Inc. 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Catelli Brothers Family of Foods 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manufacturing 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR J.C. Cannistraro LLC 773 FTE
CITY-NEAR WATERTOWN (MAWAT) 531 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAWAT - WATERTOWN 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1442 - Watertown 314 FTE
NAT-TCR Huntington Park 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR United Ammunition Container, Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EPPA Fairview Ridges Hospital 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR United Hospital Center 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pewaukee Customer Contact Center 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Shed, LLC - Breese 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corp 701 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper, Mt Carmel, PA 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.