Bridge and gate lifting machinery manufacturing · Ohio

United Fiberglass of America, Inc.

Springfield, OH · ~27 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Fiberglass of America, Inc. runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bridge and gate lifting machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

United Fiberglass of America, Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 158% of Bridge and gate lifting machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Fiberglass of America, Inc. safety composite

United Fiberglass of America, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2017→2023

United Fiberglass of America, Inc. injury rate improved

United Fiberglass of America, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.9 from 8.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.9 · 2019=9.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Springfield, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 158% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/30
  • PHOTO Sidco Filter Company
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sidco Filter Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

United Fiberglass of America, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Fiberglass of America, Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (158% of the Bridge and gate lifting machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Fiberglass of America, Inc. TCR series: 2017=8.9 · 2019=9 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where United Fiberglass of America, Inc. falls in its industry

242 Bridge and gate lifting machin establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 30 Bridge and gate lifting machin employers in Ohio.

United Fiberglass of America, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate United Fiberglass of America, Inc.
United Fiberglass of America, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

United Fiberglass of America, Inc. has fewer employees than the Bridge and gate lifting machinery manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2019 9.0 9.0 2 0 0
2017 8.9 8.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · OH · Springfield

242 Bridge and gate lifting machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 186 employers in Springfield, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sidco Filter Company 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walden 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DME Inc 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Surface, Inc. 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jeff Creque Farms Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Pond Gardens Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wen Mar Farms, Inc. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 2 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Navistar Springfield Assembly Plant 1,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Springfield Regional Medical Center 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springfield Regional Medical Center 1,512 FTE
CITY-NEAR VA Springfield 843 FTE
NAT-TCR Bushwick 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Alameda Healthcare & Wellness Center 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Linc 1857 (Arlington - F) 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Branch 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE RW Smith-Brisbane 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plainfield Renewable Energy 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tom Berkowitz Trucking, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Hallenbeck Group LLC 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.