Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers · Texas

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P.

Dallas, TX · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. runs at 405% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P.: 8.9 TCR = 405% of Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. safety composite

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2024

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. injury rate improved

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P.'s TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 27.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.0 · 2018=27.9 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=18.1 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424480 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 405% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/26
  • PHOTO Hammond
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hammond (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. averages 8.9 TCR (405% of the Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=27.9 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=3 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=18.1 · 2023=7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. falls in its industry

369 Produce, fresh, merchant whole establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 26 Produce, fresh, merchant whole employers in Texas.

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. (29 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate United Fresh Produce Group, L.P.
United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. (29 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 5.3

United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. has fewer employees than the Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2022 18.1 18.1 2 0 0
2021 9.4 9.4 3 0 0
2020 3.0 0.0 0 1 0
2019 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 27.9 23.3 11 1 0
2017 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424480 · TX · Dallas

369 Produce, fresh, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hammond 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CIBUS Fresh (Division of Piazza Produce, LLC) 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR FL VAD 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grasmick Produce Inc. 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Iliff Store 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Orchard Keepers Inc. 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Family Health Center ZSFGH 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pyrotechnique By Grucci, Inc 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Agralite Electric Cooperative 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE CIT Relay & Switch 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay Contracting Inc 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Information Technology 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.