Distribution of electric power · Minnesota

Agralite Electric Cooperative

Benson, MN · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Agralite Electric Cooperative runs at 455% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Agralite Electric Cooperative: 5.5 TCR = 455% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Agralite Electric Cooperative safety composite

Agralite Electric Cooperative scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Agralite Electric Cooperative: 3.9 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2024

Agralite Electric Cooperative's TCR rose 4.3 from 3.9 in 2017 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Benson, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.5 · 455% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #57/85
  • PHOTO CMP - Alfred Service…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMP - Alfred Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Agralite Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Agralite Electric Cooperative averages 5.5 TCR (455% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Agralite Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=10 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Agralite Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 85 Distribution of electric power employers in Minnesota.

Agralite Electric Cooperative (29 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Agralite Electric Cooperative
Agralite Electric Cooperative (29 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Agralite Electric Cooperative has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 4.1 2 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2022 10.0 3.3 2 1 0
2021 3.9 0.0 0 1 0
2020 6.5 3.3 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.7 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MN · Benson

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 17 employers in Benson, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMP - Alfred Service Center 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BENCO Electric Cooperative - Mankato Facility 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BURNEY OFFICE & SERVICE CENTER 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lisbon 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Benson 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR CNH Industrial - Benson 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR Benson Public Schools 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swift County 134 FTE
NAT-TCR Us Conveyor Technologies Mfg 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Podesta Packing LLC 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Conie Construction Company 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Osceola Core Products 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Fresh Produce Group, L.P. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lundin Roofing Company, LLC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay Contracting Inc 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Information Technology 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.