Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

United Gilsonite Laboratories

Dunmore, PA · ~95 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Gilsonite Laboratories runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

United Gilsonite Laboratories: 3.2 TCR = 98% of Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Gilsonite Laboratories safety composite

United Gilsonite Laboratories scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.3

2020→2023

United Gilsonite Laboratories injury rate improved

United Gilsonite Laboratories's TCR fell 9.3 from 9.3 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=9.3 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Dunmore, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 98% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/40
  • PHOTO Tnemec Company NKC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tnemec Company NKC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

United Gilsonite Laboratories in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Gilsonite Laboratories averages 3.2 TCR (98% of the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Gilsonite Laboratories TCR series: 2020=9.3 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where United Gilsonite Laboratories falls in its industry

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 40 Architectural coatings (i.e., employers in Pennsylvania.

United Gilsonite Laboratories (95 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate United Gilsonite Laboratories
United Gilsonite Laboratories (95 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

United Gilsonite Laboratories has more employees than the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 3 0 0
2020 9.3 3.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · PA · Dunmore

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 33 employers in Dunmore, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tnemec Company NKC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA TX Ennis Plant 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SureCrete 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Strathmore Holdings, LLC 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 301-NiSource-Uniontown PA 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE DL George and Sons Manufacturing Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Systems, Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Field 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Traditional Home Health and Hospice 721 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCRANTON GLOBAL BUSINESS SERVICES - GBS (PASCN) 525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gertrude Hawk Chocolates 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAID RITE SPECIALTY FOODS INC 365 FTE
NAT-TCR Baker Brothers Electric, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5408 Durham, NC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4051 CORONA, CA 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4745 Hesperia, CA 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Viaggio Pontoons 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electrical Contractor Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winners Inn & Casino 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Panda Management, Inc 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.