Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Massachusetts

United Industrial Service, Inc

Agawam, MA · ~25 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Industrial Service, Inc runs at 308% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

United Industrial Service, Inc: 6.5 TCR = 308% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Industrial Service, Inc safety composite

United Industrial Service, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

United Industrial Service, Inc: 0.0 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 13.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2024

United Industrial Service, Inc's TCR rose 4.6 from 0.0 in 2020 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Agawam, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 308% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #24/31
  • PHOTO NMC Group Omaha Mate…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NMC Group Omaha Material Handling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

United Industrial Service, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Industrial Service, Inc averages 6.5 TCR (308% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Industrial Service, Inc TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=13.5 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 2.1

Where United Industrial Service, Inc falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 31 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Massachusetts.

United Industrial Service, Inc (25 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate United Industrial Service, Inc
United Industrial Service, Inc (25 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

United Industrial Service, Inc has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2022 13.5 9.0 2 1 0
2021 9.5 4.8 1 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MA · Agawam

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 65 employers in Agawam, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NMC Group Omaha Material Handling 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACE TRUCK OF WV 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks San Francisco 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PrairieLand Partners - Marion 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE GREAT BARRINGTON-MA11 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE HANOVER-MA12 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Marshfield 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knollmeyer Building Corp. - 01 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson Real Estate Investors, Inc 656 FTE
CITY-NEAR OMG, Inc. 517 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABC Express Delivery, Inc. 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diana's Bakery 308 FTE
NAT-TCR Speed North America 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Vega Alta 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sdsfa - Sioux Falls Airsort 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR River View Rehab Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Smith Hauling Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lewis County Rural Electric Cooperative 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascade Bottled Water 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skyline Construction Services Inc 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.