Weldments manufacturing · Wisconsin

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc.

Cudahy, WI · ~25 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Weldments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc.: 11.7 TCR = 353% of Weldments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. safety composite

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2024

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. injury rate improved

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 5.4 from 5.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 27.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2019=27.6 · 2020=19.6 · 2021=16.8 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Cudahy, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.7 · 353% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/45
  • PHOTO Commercial Metal For…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commercial Metal Forming - California (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. averages 11.7 TCR (353% of the Weldments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2019=27.6 · 2020=19.6 · 2021=16.8 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. falls in its industry

449 Weldments manufacturing establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 45 Weldments manufacturing employers in Wisconsin.

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. (25 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc.
United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. (25 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

United Welding & Mfg. Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Weldments manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.7 6.7 1 0 0
2022 5.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 16.8 11.2 3 0 0
2020 19.6 9.8 4 0 0
2019 27.6 6.9 4 0 0
2016 5.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · WI · Cudahy

449 Weldments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 51 employers in Cudahy, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commercial Metal Forming - California 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prescor Inc. 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Helser Industries 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Source Engineering, L.L.C. 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fergusons Minnesota Harvest LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minocqua Service Center 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Janesville Headquarters 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berlin Office 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smithfield - Cudahy Packaged 1,241 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cudahy Packaged 1,131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Lukes South Shore 801 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATI Forged Products - Cudahy Operations 732 FTE
NAT-TCR Sioux City Engineering Company 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TXD063 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NCC009 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Home Builders, Inc 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Esterly Concrete Co. Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willingboro 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ardmore Bldg C (Tech Center) 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Para Los Ninos Adminstrative Office 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.