General medical and surgical hospitals · Maryland

University of Maryland Capital Region Health

Largo, MD · ~1,913 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

University of Maryland Capital Region Health runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade B.

University of Maryland Capital Region Health: 5.8 TCR = 77% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

University of Maryland Capital Region Health safety composite

University of Maryland Capital Region Health scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2021→2022

University of Maryland Capital Region Health injury rate improved

University of Maryland Capital Region Health's TCR fell 1.5 from 6.5 in 2021 to 5.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=6.5 · 2022=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Largo, MD AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 5.8 · 77% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #44/70
  • PHOTO Deaconess Midtown
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 146 inj
  • SIZE ~1,913 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Deaconess Midtown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

University of Maryland Capital Region Health in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows University of Maryland Capital Region Health averages 5.8 TCR (77% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

University of Maryland Capital Region Health TCR series: 2021=6.5 · 2022=5 · BLS 7.5

Where University of Maryland Capital Region Health falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 70 General medical and surgical h employers in Maryland.

University of Maryland Capital Region Health (1,913 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate University of Maryland Capital Region Health
University of Maryland Capital Region Health (1,913 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

University of Maryland Capital Region Health has more employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.0 2.5 77 2 0
2021 6.5 3.7 69 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MD · Largo

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 23 employers in Largo, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Deaconess Midtown 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL - JEANES CAMPUS 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cook Hospital & Care Center 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MountainView Hospital 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center 1,916 FTE
STATE-SIZE BWI-INFLIGHT 1,909 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6458-HAGE 1,921 FTE
STATE-SIZE University of Maryland Upper Chesapeake Medical Center 1,895 FTE
CITY-NEAR 97390003-500000 POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,791 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Capital Region Medical Center 1,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR 97390003-510000 FIRE EMERG MED SVCS 1,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR 97390003-560000 CORRECTIONS 432 FTE
NAT-TCR Arcadia Beverage LLC 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Shreveport 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 054517-Lax-Foy Sta 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 198935-Top-Gage Center Sta 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1855-TNNAS43 1,913 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anmed Health Medical Center 1,914 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lutheran Medical Center 1,912 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hormel Foods - Austin 1,914 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.