Managing Offices · Maryland

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Baltimore, MD · ~3,136 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Managing Offices workplace, earning a grade A.

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation: 0.1 TCR = 10% of Managing Offices BLS 0.7 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation safety composite

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation held a steady TCR band

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO ASSA ABLOY Americas …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~3,136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ASSA ABLOY Americas Residential, Inc., Lake Forest (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows University of Maryland Medical System Corporation averages 0.1 TCR (10% of the Managing Offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 0.7

Where University of Maryland Medical System Corporation falls in its industry

1,475 Managing Offices establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 Managing Offices employers in Maryland.

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation (3,136 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation (3,136 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation has more employees than the Managing Offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.1 2 1 0
2023 0.1 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · MD · Baltimore

1,475 Managing Offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ASSA ABLOY Americas Residential, Inc., Lake Forest 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BSWQA Care Management 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GA030 Atlanta - GP Center 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Las Vegas HQ 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring 3,228 FTE
STATE-SIZE MGM National Harbor 2,991 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center Inc 3,308 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark (Clark Construction, Clark Concrete,Clark Civil, Clark Foundations) 2,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate HQ 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TX140 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Honeywell Intelligrated Mason 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BSWQA Care Management 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cary 3,136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Therapy Management Corporation 3,133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL2 3,131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Hospital (Whipple) 3,141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.