Parking services, valet · Minnesota

University of Minnesota Medical Center

Minneapolis, MN · ~59 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

University of Minnesota Medical Center runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Parking services, valet workplace, earning a grade C.

University of Minnesota Medical Center: 2.5 TCR = 117% of Parking services, valet BLS 2.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

University of Minnesota Medical Center safety composite

University of Minnesota Medical Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

University of Minnesota Medical Center: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2024

University of Minnesota Medical Center's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812930 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 117% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO M Health Clinics and…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M Health Clinics and Surgery Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

University of Minnesota Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows University of Minnesota Medical Center averages 2.5 TCR (117% of the Parking services, valet BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

University of Minnesota Medical Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.1

Where University of Minnesota Medical Center falls in its industry

95 Parking services, valet establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Parking services, valet employers in Minnesota.

University of Minnesota Medical Center (59 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 134 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate University of Minnesota Medical Center
University of Minnesota Medical Center (59 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 134 employees and a TCR of 3.6

University of Minnesota Medical Center has fewer employees than the Parking services, valet median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2022 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.5 4.7 2 0 0
2018 6.1 6.1 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812930 · MN · Minneapolis

95 Parking services, valet employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M Health Clinics and Surgery Center 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellstar Kennestone 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCAM, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAZ Parking Northwest, LLC 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE JDR Technologies, LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7580 Commerce Lane NE, Fridley, MN 55432 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advantage Seamless, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sauk Rapids, MN (All State) 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Pueblo (52) 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bledsoe Cattle Co. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Canon Egg Farm 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlie C's IGA #840 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Specialty Construction Systems Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wrico Griffiths Corporation 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valco 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Exacto LLC 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.