Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping · North Carolina

Wrico Griffiths Corporation

Pineville, NC · ~59 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wrico Griffiths Corporation runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping workplace, earning a grade C.

Wrico Griffiths Corporation: 4.0 TCR = 120% of Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wrico Griffiths Corporation safety composite

Wrico Griffiths Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wrico Griffiths Corporation: 4.6 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 400.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.48× in 2024

Wrico Griffiths Corporation's TCR rose 1.2 from 4.6 in 2016 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 400.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Pineville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 120% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Domeny Tool & Stampi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Domeny Tool & Stamping Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Wrico Griffiths Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wrico Griffiths Corporation averages 4.0 TCR (120% of the Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wrico Griffiths Corporation TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=400 · 2018=0 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Wrico Griffiths Corporation falls in its industry

477 Bottle caps and tops, metal, s establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Bottle caps and tops, metal, s employers in North Carolina.

Wrico Griffiths Corporation (59 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wrico Griffiths Corporation
Wrico Griffiths Corporation (59 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Wrico Griffiths Corporation has fewer employees than the Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 1.9 2 1 0
2023 4.6 1.5 2 1 0
2022 6.9 3.5 4 0 0
2021 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.1 6.7 6 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 400.0 266.7 6 0 0
2016 4.6 3.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · NC · Pineville

477 Bottle caps and tops, metal, stamping employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 77 employers in Pineville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Domeny Tool & Stamping Company 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR U.S. Machine & Tool 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR K&S Manufacturing 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holland Production Center 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Christman Company - NC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pike Mississippi Statewide Operations 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rifenburg North Carolina, LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Carolina - 03 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0007-Atrium Health Pineville 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0007-CHS Pineville 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CLT6 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 626 EAGLETON DOWN ROAD 243 FTE
NAT-TCR Market St. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CAZ-Tempe Operations Center 0042-FAC31 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Indianapolis Zionsville 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Winchester Trucking/Division 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Specialty Construction Systems Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Minnesota Medical Center 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodcrest Village, LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleveland Office 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.